Monopoly Power, Price Discrimination, and Access to Biotechnology Innovations

Monopoly Power, Price Discrimination, and Access to Biotechnology Innovations

July 1, 2005

Albert K.A. AcquayeDepartment of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of California, Davis.Greg TraxlerDepartment of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, Auburn University. intellectual property (IP) protected innovation are analyzed. A general analytical model parameterized with data from the US introduction of Bt cotton…

Can Technology Transfer Help Public-Sector Researchers Do More with Less? The Case of the USDA’s Agricultural Research Service

Can Technology Transfer Help Public-Sector Researchers Do More with Less? The Case of the USDA’s Agricultural Research Service

July 1, 2005

Kelly Day Rubenstein and Paul W. HeiseyUnited States Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service. Private funding for agricultural research now exceeds that of the public sector. Other changes have included policies to make greater use of technology transfer mechanisms, such as patents…

Second-Generation GMOs: Where to from Here?

Second-Generation GMOs: Where to from Here?

July 1, 2005

Kenrett Y. Jefferson-MooreDepartment of Agribusiness, Applied Economics & Agriscience Education, North Carolina A&T State University.Greg TraxlerAgricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, Auburn University. The driving force behind the growth of the agricultural biotechnology industry is the potential to increase efficiency in the production…

Bt Corn Farmer Compliance with Insect Resistance Management Requirements in Minnesota and Wisconsin

Bt Corn Farmer Compliance with Insect Resistance Management Requirements in Minnesota and Wisconsin

July 1, 2005

Jessica GoldbergerProgram on Agricultural Technology Studies, University of Wisconsin-Madison.Jeanne MerrillMichael Fields Agricultural Institute.Terrance HurleyDepartment of Applied Economics, University of Minnesota. The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) reregistered Bt corn in 2001 with mandatory insect resistance management (IRM) requirements in order to…

Perceptions of the Impacts of Genetically Modified Cotton Varieties: A Case Study of the Cotton Industry in Gujarat, India

Perceptions of the Impacts of Genetically Modified Cotton Varieties: A Case Study of the Cotton Industry in Gujarat, India

July 1, 2005

Uma KambhampatiDepartment of Economics, University of Reading, UK.Stephen MorseDepartment of Geography, University of Reading, UK.Richard BennettDepartment of Agricultural and Food Economics, University ofReading, UK.Yousouf IsmaelDepartment of Agricultural and Food Economics, University ofReading, UK. The paper reports the findings of a study designed…

GM Crops: The Global Economic and Environmental Impact—The First Nine Years 1996–2004

GM Crops: The Global Economic and Environmental Impact—The First Nine Years 1996–2004

July 1, 2005

Graham Brookes and Peter BarfootPG Economics Ltd., Dorchester, UK. 2005 represents the tenth planting season since genetically modified (GM) crops were first grown in 1996. This milestone provides the opportunity to critically assess the impact this technology is having on global agriculture….

A Public Consultation on Plant Molecular Farming

A Public Consultation on Plant Molecular Farming

February 1, 2005

Edna F. Einsiedel and Jennifer MedlockUniversity of Calgary, Alberta. Plant molecular farming (PMF) is another phase in the ongoing research and development of transgenic plants, offering possibilities of producing therapeutic and industrial proteins. However, this technology poses important social and policy challenges….

Comparing the Performance of Official and Unofficial Genetically Modified Cotton in India

Comparing the Performance of Official and Unofficial Genetically Modified Cotton in India

January 1, 2005

Stephen Morse, Richard Bennett, and Yousouf IsmaelThe University of Reading, UK. Genetically modified (GM) cotton was approved for commercial cultivation in 2002. Hybrids to date have carried the Bt (Bacillus thuringiensis) gene, which confers resistance to Lepidoptera and certain Coleoptera. As well…

Evolution of Capacity for Institutionalized Management of Intellectual Property at International Agricultural Research Centers: A Strategic Case Study

Evolution of Capacity for Institutionalized Management of Intellectual Property at International Agricultural Research Centers: A Strategic Case Study

January 1, 2005

Henrik EgelyngDanish Institute for International Studies, Copenhagen. Intellectual property rights long remained a matter dealt with in vague terms of general policy at international agricultural research centers (IARCs). This situation changed at the turn of the century, when intellectual property (IP) became…